![]() ![]() For instance, a group of survivors spend half an hour building a barricade which the zombies knock down in two seconds. This also has to be one of the most grainy, dark films I've seen - a lot of the zombie attacks take place at night.įor most of the time, we get to see pointless things happen. Claudio Fragasso took over, filling the film with his confusing editing, poorly-framed shots, and general lack of technical ability. The film is poorly made - don't be fooled into thinking Lucio Fulci directed it, as he did only the first 15 minutes before being forced to retire through ill health. The only character I did find amusing was the scientist, dubbed by somebody with a stutter! It's pretty funny. The dubbing is appalling, and the usual pieces of choice dialogue to enjoy ("I'm feeling thirsty. There's a trio of amusing soldiers, one of whom is the spitting image of John Steiner. The cast are of the uninteresting, bland teenage-types who populated the likes of DEMONS 2. In fact I would have to say this is the funniest zombie film I've ever seen. ![]() A film totally irredeemable except for one small thing - it's funny. A film which swipes liberally from George Romero's dead trilogy, THE BIRDS, and even RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD. This is the film which makes ZOMBIE FLESH EATERS look like a technical masterpiece. If you've ever wanted to see a really, really awful zombie film, then this is the one for you. Reviewed by Leofwine_draca 6 / 10 Absolutely terrible.and absolutely hilarious ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |